Discussion: Psycholegal issues of competency and insanity

Discussion: Psycholegal issues of competency and insanity

In a minimum of 300 words, compare and contrast the differences between the psycholegal issues of competency and insanity (also known as criminal responsibility): Briefly identify the legal standard used to determine competency through an evaluation. What psycholegal questions need to be addressed?

Briefly identify the legal standard used to determine insanity through an evaluation. What psycholegal questions need to be addressed?

Does a mentally ill individual need to be either competent or insane, or can a person be both? Why or why not?

Comment on whether someone who is not competent to stand trial should be forced to take medications to become competent in order to face full legal penalties for his or her crimes.

Provide examples and rationales. Follow APA guidelines for writing and citing text.

Submission Details:

By Saturday, September 23, 2017, post your responses to this Discussion Area.

Through Wednesday, September 27, 2017, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. While responding, compare the similarities and differences between what you have constructed and what your classmates have.

Presents the grading criteria and rubric for this assignment.

Discussion Board Formatting 101

EXAMPLE OF INITIAL POST FORMAT (separate out each question and put the question in bold):

1. (Made up question): What are the functions of the components of mental status and an interview in determining the competence of clients? Explain with examples and rationales.

Your answer goes here. Your citations need to be in APA-style per Argosy rules but the rest of your response does not.

2. For which types of psycholegal evaluations (competency, risk of dangerousness, and insanity), if any, might an MSE provide useful information? State reasons for your answers.

Your answer goes here.

References

Argosy requires APA style references which use a hanging indent format and are double-spaced. See Purdue Owl or the APA Publication Manual for examples.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.