CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Task 2B

CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Task 2B

CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Task 2B

1. Consider the patient situation and collect cues/information • Demonstrate a

beginner’s level understanding and application of clinical reasoning cycle.

5 marks

• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.

• Correctly determines all cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Differentiates between subjective and objective cues.

• Correctly identifies all subjective and objective cues.

• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.

• Determines most cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Correctly identifies most subjective and objective cues.

• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.

• Determines many cues which are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Correctly identifies many subjective and objective cues.

• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.

• Determines some cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Correctly identifies some subjective and objective cues.

• Does not develop an initial impression of the person in the case.

• Lists cues provided in the case but cannot determine which cues are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Does not identify or incorrectly identifies subjective and objective cues.

2. Process information • Demonstrate a

beginner’s level understanding and application of clinical reasoning cycle, and

• able to apply relevant knowledge to demonstrate a clear understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the patient’s context.

20 marks

• Identifies all relevant normal and abnormal cues.

• Analyses the cues that have been collected.

• Narrows down all the important information about the cues collected.

• Demonstrates an outstanding understanding of the assessment findings and patient’s condition in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• Compares the current situation to the previous situation including patient’s past history.

• Forms a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.

• Identifies all relevant normal and abnormal cues.

• Analyses some of the cues that have been collected.

• Narrows down most of the important information about the cues collected. CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Task 2B

• Demonstrates an understanding of the assessment findings and patient’s condition in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• Compares the current situation to the previous situation.

• Forms a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.

• Identifies most normal and abnormal cues.

• Narrows down some important information about the cues collected.

• Demonstrates some understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• Compares the current situation to the previous situation.

• Attempts to form a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.

• Identifies some normal and abnormal cues.

• Demonstrates a limited understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• Some attempt at comparing the current situation to the previous situation.

• Forms a limited logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.

• Does not identify normal or abnormal cues.

• Narrowing down of important cues has not occurred.

• Does not demonstrate an understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• No comparison of the current or previous situation.

• No logical opinion is formed.

CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Assessment Task 2B – Clinical reasoning report (40%)

2

3. Critically reflect, at a beginner’s level, on your skills performance, using scholarly sources to support your reflection. 10 marks

• Demonstrates comprehensive reflection and insight.

• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.

• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains: a) what you should do differently next time, and b) why this is important for promoting a positive patient outcome.

• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with relevant connections to the current literature.

• Demonstrates solid reflection and insight throughout.

• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.

• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains: a) what you should do differently next time, and b) why this is important for promoting a positive patient outcome.

• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with some connections to the current literature.

• Demonstrates some reflection and insight throughout.

• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.

• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains what you should do differently next time.

• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with limited connections to the current literature.

• The reflection is mostly a description of the learning experience but some attempt to provide justification for events or actions which have happened.

• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.

• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and briefly explains what you should do differently next time.

• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice.

• The reflection provides a description of the skills performance only.

• The reflection does not identify any actions or identifies irrelevant actions to improve the situation (the practical skills).

4. Writes in a structured, succinct and well informed manner with references to appropriate academic literature, current research and evidence- based clinical practice guidelines. Using correct Harvard referencing style 5 marks

• A high level of academic writing with strong evidence of planning.

• The paper is exceptionally logical, insightful and balanced and is consistently expressed in a clear and fluent manner.

• Accurately references all sources using the Harvard style.

• Academic writing with strong evidence of planning.

• The paper is logical and balanced and expressed in a clear and fluent manner.

• Accurately references the majority sources using the Harvard style

• Academic writing with clear evidence of planning with a logical flow.

• Discussion is generally expressed in a clear and fluent manner.

• Accurately references the majority sources using the Harvard style.

• Academic writing using coherent and partly cohesive expression.

• Semi-structured using some academic literature to support the paper.

• Accurately references most sources using the Harvard style.

• Multiple punctuation, sentence structure and formatting errors which impact on readability.

• Non-academic sources are utilised. • Inaccurate referencing style or

does not use the Harvard style. • Uses few or no references to

support work. CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Task 2B

 

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more